Taurine, or 2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, is an organic acid widely distributed in animal tissues. It is a major constituent of bile and can be found in the large intestine.
It is also one of the main ingredients of Red Bull.
It might come as little shock to motorsport fans that the energy drink and bile should have such a chief component in common, so forthcoming has the bitterness spewed from the once all-conquering Formula 1 team been in the aftermath of the Australian Grand Prix. Down on power and down on luck, the target men of the opening half of the decade were lapped in the opening race of the 2015 season and could barely put up a fight to a team which had failed to score a single point the season before.
But the concept that anyone is to blame for the situation Red Bull finds itself in other than them is laughable.
Red Bull Racing opted to align itself with Renault some years ago. Once the engine manufacturer gave up its role as a Formula 1 constructor to focus on its primary function, Red Bull essentially became its factory team. It was a symbiotic relationship and yet not one without flaws. Red Bull took, as its title sponsor, Infiniti. Although owned by Nissan and thus part of the same family as Renault, it deflected attention away from the French company, which was vocal in its disappointment that more was not made of its input into Red Bull’s four consecutive World Constructors’ and Drivers’ Championships.
The discontent was only heightened last year when after four years of total domination, Red Bull willfully threw their engine partner under the bus once its hybrid power unit was seen not to be as reliable or competitive as had been expected or promised.
Had those at Red Bull held memories that went back further than their years of domination, they might well have remembered that the penultimate engine regulation change had left Renault floundering. And the one before that. If we recall, when the V8 engines were frozen back in 2007, it was Mercedes which proved to have the best unit while the other suppliers pleaded and were finally permitted to catch up. While Renault had been all conquering on the change from V10 to V8 for 2005 and 2006, it was under an engine freeze that the company struggled. As it does today.
Comments made by Cyril Abiteboul to the French press after Australia should leave Red Bull feeling chastened, as the Managing Director of Renault Sport F1 admitted that the power units used by Red Bull in Melbourne included components which had been rushed through against the advice and regular testing processes employed at Viry Chatillon. Abiteboul, far from admitting Mea Cupla, stood firmly in his employer’s corner and came out swinging. It was Red Bull which had ordered the rush. It was Red Bull which had insisted on running brand new parts. It was Red Bull which was the architect of its own downfall.
But the headlines remain, and the negativity sticks. Despite Christian Horner’s own pleas that the sport cease from airing its dirty laundry in public, it was he and Red Bull’s motorsport advisor Helmut Marko who made the loudest noises in the aftermath of the race that the formula was broken and that, if things didn’t change, Red Bull would consider quitting.
It’s a stunt Luca di Montezemolo used to employ at Ferrari. When things aren’t going your way, threaten to pull the most storied brand in the sport out of competition, and you’ll get your way. Only di Montezemolo stopped getting his way. And then he stopped getting the support of his bosses. And then he got replaced.
How different, how refreshing, to have Ferrari’s new guard come out after Melbourne and state categorically that Mercedes should not be pegged back. It is a challenge for Ferrari to rise up and face head on, they said. The bosses at Maranello finally understand that only by acting in such a virtuous fashion will they add value to their brand.
When have you heard McLaren threaten to quit? Even in Melbourne, running five seconds a lap off the pace, Ron Dennis was nothing but effervescent about the future possibilities of his team’s partnership with Honda. When have you heard Williams threaten to walk away? These two great, once dominant, multiple world championship winning teams are the epitome of racing resilience. Neither has taken a constructors’ crown in over a decade and a half. Yet where is the quit threat?
Red Bull might do well to remember the words of Ron Dennis: “Neither success nor failure is ever final.”
The garagistes of old are the grandees of today, now facing a new challenge fronted by marketeers determined to bend the sport around their every commercial whim. Like a plague… swarming, devouring all before it until there is nothing left upon which to feast and moving on. The life blood of a drinks company is not racing. Why then, should their every demand be met with deference and subservience by a governing body and commercial arm terrified of losing a brand which, in the grander scheme of things, is a Johnny Come Lately?
Red Bull is not Ferrari. Its threats to quit the sport should hold not nearly the same resonance or fear.
The last time Red Bull got their sums wrong, really wrong, was Barcelona 2013. I remember the race so clearly. By the fifth lap, my producer Jason Swales and I had given each other a knowing smile and phoned through what we saw as their strategy to the NBC commentary team. In an era of Pirelli tyres which the world thought one had to preserve, Fernando Alonso was banging in quali laps on full fuel. He and Ferrari were flipping the script and would run the tyres off their rims. They were going to four stop.
By the time Red Bull, and most of the world, had figured out their ploy it was too late. Embarrassed by their own failings, Red Bull made the same grand statements they have been forced into making post Melbourne. That this isn’t racing. That this isn’t Formula 1. It’s too confusing. Too complicated. The variables are too diverse. And we are questioning whether we want to be a part of it.
Only Ferrari, Lotus and Force India had properly designed their cars around the tyres in 2013. The likes of Red Bull and Mercedes were chewing through them. For Mercedes, overworking the rears was a perennial issue. For Red Bull, Ferrari’s masterstroke in Barcelona had left them flat footed. Calls were made for changes to the tyres. They were calls which went, initially, unheeded.
And so extreme measures were employed: adverse and extreme camber, under inflation, and the switching of tyres to opposite sides of the car. Every team reacted, even Ferrari. It all combined to create the blowouts of the British Grand Prix. The teams could now claim Pirelli’s tyres were dangerous and needed redesigning. Pirelli came out strongly in its own defense, arguing that the tyres were being used by the teams against Pirelli’s own recommendations and in a manner which could, under certain circumstances, become dangerous.
But the teams, headed by Red Bull, got their way. More durable tyres were constructed. Ferrari, Lotus and Force India lost their advantage.
It now must seem bitterly ironic that in that one move, Red Bull had led a charge which removed the one variable which Mercedes had been unable to resolve themselves, setting the foundations upon which, aligned to a magnificent power unit and beautifully designed car, the team would launch its dominant 2014 campaign.
A case of being careful for what one wishes for, perhaps.
Pirelli has been cast as the villain ever since for then becoming too conservative in its tyre allocations. With more durable rubber produced for 2015, already those same proclamations are being made for the current season. But we would do well to remember that all of this has its roots in 2013 and the very public, very damaging negative comments about the state of the sport and the publicly raised questions over the continued involvement of Red Bull.
How then, does Formula 1 react to its latest quit threat? Does it panic and set itself on a course towards further ruin? Or does it call Red Bull’s bluff? For never have the needs of the many outweighed the needs of the few… or the one… more than they do in F1 today. No one team is bigger than the sport, and pandering to the whim of a single outfit has never resulted in a positive outcome for the furtherance of competition.
So Red Bull wants to quit. Let it. It is locked into the sport until 2020. The only way it is getting out is by selling up.
Renault is in talks to buy Toro Rosso. Strengthening paddock talk links Audi with an all-out take-over at Milton Keynes.
Perhaps it is time to leave racing to racers. And the bile for the fizzy drinks.
I can’t see Red Bull’s F1 venture any different from their NASCAR one. Except of course that F1 is a global phenomena, so it’s not that easy to pull the plug if it’s not going their way. With NASCAR, they didn’t have anything on their hands to complain about. The cars are built be be virtually identical, they just weren’t as good in doing so, plain and simple.
Yes, Renault built a crap engine. If RB can’t take it as a problem to be solved by e.g. switching to Mercedes, even by paying off Renault with a big sum for breaking contract, or just leave for whatever racing series is their liking (oh, Ogier wins every single rally with Red Bull plastered over that VW, so did Loeb with the Citroen; any problem with that?) or just quite for good.
After all, it’s not like they were powered by Honda.
Just, in the WRC nobody gets to the level of Loeb or Ogier. The DS3 is clearly a bad car compared to the Polo but Loeb could make it work in the last Monte after a year out. That’s clearly a case of driver quality (Mads Ostberg even said Loeb would find it difficulty to get up to speed, and then in the forst stage he was 20 sec faster than the second guy, Ott Tänak and at least 30 secs faster than the rest.)
If you wanna make your case, search for better example or read some more, mate.
Huh? What are you on about? He’s making the point that they don’t complain and throw a hissy fit about non-competitiveness when it’s their sponsored driver / team that’s doing all the dominating. They only get childish when someone else is making them look silly.
This is the problem with Red Bull: They want to buy wins and hate losing money. They aren’t an actual motorsports company that wants to compete. They sell piss colored rain water and plaster their logo on to what ever they think is going to win.
Absolutely cracking post Will! Couldn’t agree more
I’ve always said Red Bull and CVC are the two worst disasters that ever happened to Formula 1. One keeps the costs up – but has the nerve to publically call the sport too expensive – and the other milks the sport for money that it has done absolutely nothing to earn. If Red Bull does leave Formula 1, only good things can come out of it.
CVC bought a majority share of FOM, essentially from Bernie (there were interim owners). That is what they invested and therefore it is their right to earn whatever they deem appropriate contingent on the businesses ability to deliver. If CVC ruins the business in the process, it’s their (CVC) loss.
People bang on about CVC while not understanding that it is Bernie who sold out the sport’s equity to financial sponsors for his personal gain, and his personal gaining the equity was contingent on the financial sponsors loading FOM with debt.
“If CVC ruins the business in the process, it’s their (CVC) loss.”
Yes, decades of history, tens of millions of fans, business (directly involved or otherwise) worth billions y-o-y, employment in the five figures, yep, that aside it’s CVC’s loss.
You are somehow attempting to argue that CVC is not one of the worst disasters for the sport? Since they own the majority of the business, is it not their responsibility to look after its health?
And are they doing a good job of that?
So again, how is CVC not one of the worst disasters to happen to F1? Because I wholeheartedly agree with Olli that they are essentially failing miserably to do anything EXCEPT line their own pockets with the cash they suck out of the sport.
Totally agree. Problem is would FIA have the balls to stand up to them?
Red Bull marketing only wishes to have their brand on the top contestant of whatever event they participate in. AMA Supercross, F1, WRC and so on. You are the top competitor? Let us sponsor you! Not the top anymore, they’re out.
Let them go. They don’t have the fortitude to handle being a race team with the ups and downs that go along with it.
Spot on, Will!
While I am in total agreement with the article, let’s not forget Red Bull floundered from the midfield to the back for a good number of years post Jaguar. They put a strong engineering team together (i.e. threw money at it) and began to reap the rewards.
In other words it’s not like Red Bull bought into a winning outfit. They genuinely built up from a low point and established a respectable winning team.
All this latest tirade appears to do is verify the accuracy of the age old adage, power corrupts. With their multiple years at the top they have lost sight of that fighting spirit from whence came the success.
I think what we have here is Horner fearing for his own job, his legacy confined to the Vettel diffuser years as Mateschitz rattles the cage.
Time to shake that can of Red Bull and pop the ring pull indeed!
Wow this post is full of insights I never thought of. Very clever and interesting, and I couldn’t agree more!
Couldn’t agree more. Well written and full of things I didn’t know about.
They just seem like a bunch of sore losers. I don’t understand the public admonishment of Renault either. Now the Vettel move makes perfect sense, they have lose there way.
I hope what you say here is used by you and your colleagues during the practice days as a discussion point in Malaysia.
Bravo. However, this has always been the problem with full works teams. They’re fickle and they leave, taking entire factories with them.
It is the privateers that have always kept F1 what it is. They want to be here. Red Bull want to sell pop.
funny you mention bile and Fizzy drinks..Monster engery drink is filth oh who is a sponsor and Hype has just landed on Force india..food for thort
As usual Will your comments are spot on. Christian Horner and Red Bull are surely the ultimate definition of Spoilt brats. I don’t recall them thinking life was so unfair for the years they were bending the rules and winning almost every fortnight either. Hopefully, Renault will pull the plug on them for insubordination long before all the Red Bull toys have left the pram.
Correct sharpy, about bending the rules. Seems at one time they were under possible investigation and their qualifying one and two, suddenly disappeared, only to come back when the possible investigation was dismissed.
Amen, brother.
Spot On Will, thank you and I hope your blog is read by all the powers that be at RBR and by Bernie and Todt!
>”four years of total domination”
>winning two of those championships by less than 3 points in the last race
pick one
This isn’t journalism, this is just whiney shitposting.
Four consecutive drivers and constructors championships, and the sport altering the scoring to ensure the title wasn’t wrapped up before the final round… I’d say Red Bull were pretty dominant between 2010 and 2013.
I do agree they are being a bunch of babies…but in their defense the FIA went a little overboard on trying to reign in their advantage when they were dominating. Movable floor boards where a bit of a grey area in my book but everybody complained and they took RB down a notch. When they kept changing the tests for flexible wings, that was a clear attempt to block Red Bull in my opinion. I don’t think handicapping Merc is fair, but they need to fully open up development on the engines to even give RB a chance to, in Toto’s words “‘just get your f—–g head down, work hard and try to sort it out”. Their is only so much RB can do as a non engine manufacturer.
While I can’t deny the sour grapes, as a fan, it leaves me looking for the secondary story lines to keep me waking up at 7am to watch the races. It’s one race, but this year I don’t expect there to be such a close battle between Lewis and Nico. Lewis has his stuff together so the title chase will most likely be a snooze fest. Watching the rookies will be fun, but Ferrari clawing their way back into the battle is the only hope for some top level excitement.
To ‘fully open up development’ will take money. They can’t take more from fans (tickets/TV) where they have already passed the point of diminishing returns so it will come from the profits (CVC/Bernie). Bernie will not let that happen so he will try to ‘equalise’ things by destroying competition. He does not see that by doing so he will reduce fans interest in the sport and ultimately reduce its revenue.
Funny. Very funny.
I wonder what tractor friend calls “domination”.
Tractor, you are referring to the Drivers Championship.
Will is referring to Constructors Championship, which is far more relevant.
The smallest margin they had was 2010, when they won the championship by 44 points.
Yes, for four years, Red Bull (team) dominated.
“Leave racing to racers”?
Because Mercedes is not in F1 to sell more cars. And neither is Ferrari, or Honda, right?
You leave the racing to the racers and you end up with Williams, powered by… what? Love?
And you sell cars by winning races. It’s the oldest adage in the book. “Win on Sunday, sell on Monday.”
You win races by racing. Racers race. It’s not that hard to get your head around.
100% agree with you on this one. If they want to quit someone will buy them and hopefully be a little less smug when they win and whingy when they lose.
Brilliant.
Great article Will. Im a 31 year old American who began watching and following F1 in 2007, and haven’t missed a race since . Previous to that I was prone to watching NASCAR. This talk from the likes of RedBull scare me, not of them leaving the sport, that’s fine, as you said; let them. What worries me is the talk of “equalization” in F1, or to level the playing field. That to me sounds like stock car racing where all the cars are basically the same with a few different stickers.
I personally love the fact that there is a team that is utterly dominating the sport, they have worked harder and better then the others to get where they are and are reaping the rewards from it. The probability of Mercedes winning almost all of the Grand Prix this year doesn’t turn me away from the sport, its like I’m watching history. 10, 20 years from now I’ll be able to look back at these years and recall how remarkable they were. Just as people are now of McLaren in the 80’s or periods of Ferrari domination throughout the sport.
What would turn me off to Formula 1 would be any sort of “equalization” because then F1 becomes like NASCAR and that would be boring.
Other teams just need to catch up and have the mentality of Ferrari’s new boss at the moment, WORK HARDER TO GET TO THE TOP OF THE SPORT. After all that is how the world works, you strive to be the best at whatever you do. If you’re lackluster in life you don’t cry and tell someone to stop doing a good job so you can be better without trying harder.
-David
Agree. And a team that puts in the work and challenges Mercededs will be able to hold it’s head high when they win, knowing the world will see they did it with sweat and hard work, not a re imagining of the rules in favour of them. Why can’t teams see this?
Exactly, a point I forgot to make. So I’m glad you mentioned it. I would imagine that a team getting up to Mercedes level and then taking a few race wins, and ultimately putting themselves in a position to consistently compete with them will enjoy it much more having done it through their own hard work, not because someone or some entity leveled the playing field so they could win.
Imagine all of the people at the factories, and how much more rewarding it will feel to them knowing they were able to bring their cars to the top with their own engineering accomplishments, the morale would be through the roof! Much more then if they were beating Mercedes because “someone” forced Mercedes to slow down and that is why they were able to win again.
David – Great point! For us stateside F1 fans, we’ve had a front row seat of domestic major auto racing series warping themselves in various convulated ways to maintain synthetic parities. It’s not attractive.
You’ve touched upon an underlying essential beauty of F1.
Will, totally agree with you! You only failed to mention the complicity and compounding influence of King Bernie. F1 suffered once when the era of auto-company teams lost fashion, and they are suffering now catering again to Bernie’s never-ending chase for the fattest wallet. Turn F1 back to RACING TEAMS. Let Audi, Renault, Mercedes, hell even Ferrari, provide engines. Require the teams to be separate entities.
Brilliant!
Will,
You got me at your first paragraph! Well done! This is why it is worth to wait the wait in between your posts.
I totally agree with you on this one, let them leave, they are a drink company. Let Renault come in with their own team. I do have to say that I’m not a fan of the current engines at all but that’s another issue.
“It is a challenge for Ferrari to rise up and face head on, they said.”
Back in the early 2000s when Schumacher and Ferrari were winning everything in sight, Ron Dennis was asked if the governing body should take some action to remove the advantage that Ferrari had. Dennis replied (I can’t remember the exact words), “It is not for the FIA to slow Ferrari down. It is for the other teams to raise their games”. I always like that reply.
And congrats, another great column. I hope NBCSN gives you more air time this year. Maybe you could guest star on the NASCAR coverage 😉
Flashback to 1988 when McLaren-Honda with Senna and Prost were winning everything… I remember there was some talk as to what to do about it. During a pre-race show (can’t remember which GP), Riccardo Patrese of Williams said much the same thing: “It’s not to slow them down, we have to speed us up”.
Great post.
The one thing that is missing imo is that Red Bull has also dropped the ball on the aero side this year.
They’ve failed the crash tests on their short nose design & so have not been able to run that & it’s associated aero package in general. Effectively they were running an interim testing aero packing in Australia.
Causing this stink about Renault is a great way to deflect from their own failings – barely beating their junior team running the same engines with 2 rookie drivers & a fraction of the budget.
Too many news outlets are just printing Horner & Marko’s whining without questioning. Wonder if they would be so keen on also equalising their FOM payouts as part of an equalisation plan?
Excellent point, well made. Bravo sir!
Great analysis. Thanks and keep it up.
Reblogged this on the SNUFALUFAGUS.
THANK YOU FOR THAT Will!!
Absolutely Spot On! Nice to see the change in thinking at Ferrari!
Yes let us all think about McLaren, and Williams!! They never cry out! They put their heads down and work harder!!
Long Live F1 !!
Will, this is one of your best articles to date! Thank you for this.
I hesitate to suggest that dropping off of twitter may have improved your writing, but this article is one of the best I’ve seen.
I never was crazy about Red Bull anyways and watching them win 4 years in row wasn’t even interesting. They are not even a car manufacture team like Ferrari, Mclaren, Lotus. Then again neither is Force India or Williams but at least they are not complaining and making improvements. I would love to see Renault back in and even a new team like Audi.
Bye Bye Red Bull
Reblogged this on bobespirit2112 and commented:
Great take on Red Bull’s whining by Will Buxton; right on, Will!
Thank you for the topping journalism. Given the Whitmarsh and di Montezemolo/Domenicalli dismissals of not so long ago, Horner is rightly concerned. Great time for Audi to get in there. Such a race-credentialed manufacturer entering F1 opens the enticing prospect of them attracting (poaching?) drivers from the very top of the line-up. At the end of the Red Bull “fizzle”, add the also race-credentialed Renault to the mix and the sport promises to be far from ailing.
Amazing Will, just amazing!
Great post! However, a question, with Red Bull’s multi-year displeasure with Renault engines; have they ever tried to “buy” an engine from one of the manufacturers that left (i.e. BMW, Cosworth, Toyota)? If they dislike Renault powerplants so much, why not just break contract and funnel their cash train to one of the other outfits and make it so convincing to force them to stay in F1?
I would hope the drivers would get to stay though. I don’t know where they would go but I love Kvyat and would hope to see him even if RB were to go away.
There is bigger issues in RB behind the scenes. Vettle, Pete Prod and a clutch of other important team members hit the high road.
IMO Pete Prod is the biggest loss to them. This is the main reason that AN is more involved than was anticipated. Although when the team GB trawler is being mocked up his input on the F1 side will definitely reduce.
I thought the incessant whining of CH regarding the tyres was bad form. Last years engine whining was pretty pathetic also. But this years takes the biscuit.
They’ve shown that the moral in the team is banjaxed by saying they’re thinking of leaving.
We got rid of one pain in the ass whinger when Luca got his marching orders. Getting daddy bull and baby bull out the gap would be a real result too.
They have far too much clout for Jonney come latelys, Bernie’s fawning at the A1 ring was an embarrassment, and their attitude is as toxic as the horrible stuff they peddle to ‘dudes’.
Goodbye, he says hopefully…..
[…] be allowed to leave F1 without too much more fuss if that’s what the company really wants. The post is here, and it doesn’t need any further embellishment from anyone […]
Will, FYI:
Cheers/lol
Bye bye RBR. I hope that the door does hit you in the ass on your way out.
Reblogged this on Pappillon and commented:
Will Buxton, speaking truth to power and telling it like it is, since 1899™
Nice job Will! You had me at “bile”. While I have found it easy not to root for RB just on principle alone, I have appreciated their involvement from a spectator point of view. There is a certain colorful personality within the team that is (was?) refreshing. It seemed no one enjoyed winning more that RB. That being said, as a 20+ year fan of F1, I am even more appreciative of Williams, Ferrari and McLaren and how they have weathered the F1 storm with a racers mentality. Racers race to win and for the purity of competition. I would like to believe that even if F1 was not the behemoth it is now that these and other like them would still be racing – as that’s what racers do.
Thank you for your insightful blog and the great coverage on NBCSN. We who live in the (northwest) US are fortunate to have you on-site to give us the color and flavor of F1.
Dietrich Mateschitz is the latest in a long line of owners who have failed to accept the most basic truth in racing-you don’t stay on top. How many times has Ferrari reached the pinnacle of the sport, then fallen onto hard times? Williams went from domination to midfield to a laughing stock. But they didn’t quit. They worked to rebuild the team, find the right combination of people and equipment that would bring them back to contention, if not yet victory.
And blaming others because your team sucks, after years of being the top dog, gets you nothing.
The only thing I really dislike about Will’s blog posts is the loooooong time between them!!
This is your best yet, Will. Just too spot on for words. For the past year I’ve been saying “Let the clowns go!” to anyone who’d listen. So tired of the “Horner and Marko and Tiny Tears” act…
Do ya know what this is, Christian? It’s the world’s smallest violin…
Remember, Will is busy! He’s flying all over the world to do live pit reporting at the races for NBC Sports…
Magnificent post!!!! Could not agree more with you. Let the racing to racers….
Be careful what you wish for …
Quality piece Mr Buxton, RedBull have done their brand no favours with this round of crying.
This the FIA Formula1 championship, not Formula RedBull.
I disagree. I am a lifelong McLaren fan, no love for Red Bull but they were pulled back at every opportunity.
Now F1’s loverboy (HAM) is winning everyone seems to forget the lack of competition.
F1 is about as fake as WWE these days. If the bad guy is winning, disadvantage him, if the good guy is winning….all is good, business as usual.
I turned off for the first time in 20 years last week. And I sat through 2000-2004, so that gives an idea of my tolerance for repetition.
When the nasty German (VET) was winning everyone was crying like a baby and calling RB cheats, now the heroic Englishman is winning everyone else has to catch up. You people are like a stained glass window. You try to colour it in different ways, but I can still see right through to the other side.
Will….you should add another garagista…..Sauber.
Sauber, Williams and McLaren….old timers….always in Formula 1 and along with Ferrari, the only 4 teams that knows that you cannot always win in F1 and will stick in difficult times.
This four teams deserve our RESPECT
don’t forget that Red Bull actually owned a majority share holding in Sauber for a time. Without the Austrian investment I don’t think the team would still be around.
Hi Will,
Great insight. Glad you are avoiding the paddock kool-aid and staying objective!
Usually good articles, but this one’s just pure hate speech. Expected better from you Will.
The Red Bull – Renault relationship is like a broken marriage. No matter how you try to paper over the cracks, each party will concentrate on the bad points rather than remember the good times. Red Bull getting AVL in Austria to look at the engine after the start of the season is ludicrous (without prejudice to AVL).
Red Bull and Renault have painted themselves into this corner – there are no credible alternatives. The fact that Toro Rosso did a pretty good job in Melbourne on a smaller budget should be a wake up call for Red Bull. Their chassis have been consistently excellent over the years, but now? Melbourne, however, is not a representative track. Let’s wait for the Tilke-dromes (and a few more races) before writing RB-Renault off.
An amen for Brother Buxton!
Spoken like a true warrior who hasn’t got the slightest clue…
Ah Hippo. We can always rely on you to disagree with whatever is written on this site, no matter what it is. Quality insight and debate as always.
I’m watching the 12 Hours of Sebring right now. A race where I don’t already know who is going to win.
Will,
As a fan of F1 since the 60’s dominance comes & goes through rules interpretation & brilliance. Red Bull is an promoter & really nothing more. They are not racers in the true sense. For them winning is the only way. Sportsmanship is beyond their comprehension. By playing the rules their Brand has become world renowned & like the tobacco giants before them their time has come. We the fans of course want closer racing but given the FIA & Bernie backroom dealings this is what we get. Money has always been a part of racing but today we as fans have to ask at what cost?
Here in the States we have the NASCAR juggernaut that stifles a true racers mind. The dealings, the “parity” that sucks the life out of racing reality. Yes there’s money to be made but again at what cost? To be sure F1 could learn a few things from NASCAR about promotion,fees,& even rules but F1 needs to get back to it’s roots! Stop chasing the golden $$$$.
Let Red Bull Leave! They would be better promoting the sport than trying to run it. Get rid of Bernie,& CVC & restructure the sport so all the teams can benefit & we fans can fall back in love with F1.
Keep writing Will, you insight into the soul of F1 gives me hope that there is a silver lining in this black cloud.
ps Watching the 12 Hrs. Of Sebring
What a truely pathetic piece from an “F1 Journo”.
Redbull have every right to complain about the situation they find themselves in.
Yes they chose Renault as their engine partner. Amazingly they expected them to deliver a power unit that allowed them to compete with the front end of the field. Renault have failed spectacularly 2 years in a row to do that and are showing no signs of getting on top of their problems.
That wouldn’t necessarily be a problem if the regulations didn’t bake in Mercedes engine advantage with the token system that is supposed to control team spending. Come again? Mercedes are widely reported to have spent a record amount in winning last years’ championship. Great success FIA! You’ve closed off the ability of competitors to compete whilst incurring them more cost.
Can the token system and allow teams to spend what they want to get them back on parity. The red herring that Mercedes will continue to stay ahead is patently absurd as the law of diminishing returns will bring them back to the field, IF the other engine manufacturers are allowed to develop in season as they wish. Likewise the 4 engine rule is ridiculous whilst manufacturers are clearly still trying to mature the technology. Another fantastic piece of planning by the FIA.
Don’t forget that Red Bull, as part of the Strategy Group or what at the time of the formulation of these rules was the Technical Working Group, and of course the F1 Commission, could at any point have argued against the rule changes or put up their own suggestions for amendments. Its a vague and bizarre form of democracy, but they had the opportunity to air grievances. They didn’t. So they’re as culpable as anyone else. I’m no fan of the 4 engine a season rule. I don’t think that the token system is a great idea. Truth be told, I don’t even like the idea of an engine freeze. F1 should be an open formula for free development of all areas. But these are the rules. Same for everyone. It’s RBR and their partners’ job to step up to the challenge, not whinge and threaten to take their ball home.
Problem i have with this piece that it takes a few elements to empasize the story and forgets other facts / elements that are equally important. I see this more and more with f1 bloggers lately. You can rewrite the story completely from red bulls side with the right examples. Just to name two. What were the point differences per year in the drivers / contructors list and compare that with last year…. You will get a complete different picture. Next example in the same period you can find examples exactly reverse where Ferrari made a complete fuckup of their strategy in stead of Red Bull. Oh yeah and lets not forget all rule chanes in those four years….
Problem is to understand how important Red Bull is for F1. And that is simple to understand. There are only three groups really important. Mercedes because of its engine, Ferrari because well without Ferrari no F1, and Red Bull because of two teams and their money. Those that believe any of the other teams are important,except for making the nrs on the grid…. Sorry nope. Sure anyone would moan if williams would go broke, but three days later and the next story breaks… (Look at sauber story). Those that believe audi will step in? Think twice, they will not. Neither will BMW.
Then last any commitment in F1 is unreliable. I cannot believe that this article states commited uo to 2020 so only option to sell. Utter nonsense. Quick calculation is risk mngmnt and roi. If red bull feels it is not commercially viable they will and can pull the plug anytime. Will it cost a lot of money? Yes. But that is just a commercial descicion. So is the threat just to be ignored? No i do not believe that it should be ignored. Could hv been handled pr wise a bit differently. Is the gap between mercedes and the rest too big. Yes it is. It is unhealthy for f1. We need close racing with multiple winners and not only in the midfield. F1 is in a downward spirale for all to see. The other teams not complaining is also untrue. Plenty of examples even from mercedes during those 4 years. That is f1 normal behaviour. That they do not complain right now is simple because they wait for red bull to take the lead. That is easier for all of them. Ferrari simply cannot do: they decided against complaint and politics, instead for full reorganisation so they simply cannot. Not yet! I loved the message from Massa… We hv the same engines like Merc so it must be the chassis… Or not?
Last a pity you did not write a blog like this on the Sauber situation… I wonder why that is! One remark in general i hv which i can not find an answer. Why is there no real F1 investigative journalism. Is the treat to be kicked out so real that everone just writes the blabla without facts and figures?
Still… I enjoyed reading and visiting yr blog. Keep on going!
Christian Horner is a clever individual, the RBR quit threat was ill conceived but a position the team developed based on the rhetoric we’ve had for years from Ferrari. I can imagine Horner and the team view will be very different come this weekend, with a “try harder” position to mimic Ferrari.
I believe Red Bull’s longer term position in the sport should be as a sponsor rather than team owner. Fan’s would benefit from the company investing into enhancing the race going experience rather than developing front wing configuration.
Whilst I’m not suggesting Renault would deliberately turn out a bad engine, but the current team performance of both RBR and STR is devaluing the assets. Could Renault buy both teams for a lower than anticipated price?
As an aside, I have heard Mclaren are making a significant number of back office redundancies on the quiet. The lack of sponsorship or success may be having more of an impact on the team than they would like us to think. Will, have you heard anything about this?
[…] threw their toys out of the pram. Despite F1’s grid anorexia, this is a plea that should be (and has been) met with derision. In fact, calling their bluff may be the required catalyst for substantive […]
Fantastic writing. Please bring this up during the broadcast this weekend.
That was a hilarious opening Will! Hit the nail on the head with that and the rest of the post.
Over the years, I’ve enjoyed lots of auto racing, from Indy cars to NASCAR to Formula One and everything else I could find. Red Bull pitching a hissy fit and threatening to pull out of F1 is no surprise to me. When they came into NASCAR, they made a big point to be as brash as possible before their debut. It was as if the notion that a start-up team with a new manufacturer and only one of their two drivers with any tangible experience in Cup could possibly do less than stellar, much less fall on its face, never entered anyone’s mind. Yet when AJ Allmendinger didn’t qualify for several races and Brian Vickers ran at the back, it caught Red Bull by surprise. Sure, they stayed for several years, and even managed two wins with Brian Vickers and loaner driver Kasey Kahne, but in the end they got mad and quit. And by the time they left, no one in the stands was sad to see them go.
I know NASCAR and Formula One are two very different entities. One is a regional series run almost exclusively on oval tracks with what are essentially spec cars, the other is a global series run on road courses with cars that vary quite a bit from manufacturer to manufacturer. Formula One cars are technological tour de forces, while NASCAR racers are almost stone age crude by comparison. They require very different driving styles, and it has been very, very seldom that a driver in one has found success in the other. I love them both, and I watch them both. And what I’ve seen is that Red Bull as a motorsports company is the biggest bunch of whiners and complainers in the industry. Character building isn’t built in Tahiti; the character of a man or a company isn’t measured when they are succeeding, but rather when they are struggling with adversity. When Red Bull faces hard times, they can’t take the pressure, and their key members whine like petulant toddlers or just quit and leave. Racing is full of enough characters who pout and moan. If Red Bull threatens to leave, call them on it, and if they leave, it’s not a great loss.
[…] A link from a few weeks ago, but well worth a read by Will Buxton, a journo who always tells it as it is. For those keeping […]
Fantastic take and essential reading for anybody trying to make sense of what feels like a tipping point in F1 history. Racing is a transcendent and pure experience. It’s so simple, everybody understands it from the moment they can crawl. But the business, politics, and personalities are now more complex than the cars.
F1 needs a thorough spring cleaning and if RBR gets swept up with the trash, so be it.
I have been reading F1 news daily for decades. This article was probably the best I have ever read. Well done, Will!
Reblogged this on secreteyes4.